Evaligo vs Make.com
Looking for a Make.com alternative for AI workflows? Compare visual workflow builders and find the best platform for your automation needs.
Quick Verdict: Choose Evaligo for AI-native workflows with prompt testing and API deployment. Choose Make.com for complex data transformations and maximum integration options at lower cost.
Evaligo
AI-Native Platform
Make.com
Visual Automation
Key Differences at a Glance
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
1AI Capabilities
| Feature | Evaligo | Make.com |
|---|---|---|
Native AI/LLM Integration | Built-in prompt nodes with 10+ AI providers | ~OpenAI module only |
Prompt Testing & Evaluation | Side-by-side testing, evaluators, scoring | Not available |
AI Vision Processing | Native image analysis nodes | ~Via OpenAI module |
Structured Output (JSON Schema) | Guaranteed JSON output formatting | Manual parsing required |
Multi-Model Comparison | Compare outputs across providers | Single provider only |
2Workflow Building
| Feature | Evaligo | Make.com |
|---|---|---|
Visual Drag & Drop Builder | Node-based flow editor | Scenario canvas |
Branching Logic | Condition nodes | Router modules |
Parallel Processing | Iterator with concurrency control | Iterator module |
Error Handling | Automatic retry with backoff | Error handlers, break |
Data Mapping | Visual data mapper | Advanced data mapping |
Version Control | Built-in versioning | ~Blueprint export only |
3Deployment & Scale
| Feature | Evaligo | Make.com |
|---|---|---|
API Endpoint Deployment | One-click production APIs | ~Webhooks with limitations |
Real-time Execution | Instant API responses | Instant scenarios |
Scheduling | Cron-based scheduling | Interval scheduling |
Operations/Runs Tracking | Detailed run logs | Operations history |
Data Storage | Built-in datasets | Data stores |
4Integrations
| Feature | Evaligo | Make.com |
|---|---|---|
Pre-built Integrations | 100+AI-focused integrations | 1,500+Wide coverage |
Custom HTTP Requests | Full HTTP node | HTTP module |
Web Scraping | Built-in page scraper | ~Web scraper module |
Database Connections | Direct DB access | Various DB modules |
Pricing Comparison
Make.com has lower base pricing but charges per "operation". AI workflows typically consume many operations per run.
| Plan | Evaligo | Make.com |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 - 500 runs/mo Full AI features | $0 - 1,000 ops/mo 2 active scenarios |
| Core/Starter | $29/mo 5,000 runs, all features | $9/mo 10,000 ops, unlimited scenarios |
| Pro | $79/mo 25,000 runs | $16/mo 10,000 ops + priority |
| Teams | $199/mo Unlimited + collaboration | $29/mo 10,000 ops + team features |
| Enterprise | Custom SLA + priority support | Custom Custom operations |
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Evaligo if you need:
- AI workflows with multiple LLM providers
- Prompt testing and evaluation before deployment
- Structured JSON output from AI models
- Deploy workflows as production APIs
- AI vision and image processing
- Web scraping with AI analysis
- Token cost tracking and optimization
Choose Make.com if you need:
- Maximum number of app integrations (1,500+)
- Complex data transformations and mapping
- Lower starting price for basic automation
- Established ecosystem and templates
- Advanced error handling with transactions
- Team collaboration on scenarios
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Evaligo vs Make.com
What is the main difference between Evaligo and Make.com?
Both Evaligo and Make.com offer visual workflow builders, but Evaligo is purpose-built for AI workflows with native LLM integration, prompt testing, and structured output handling. Make.com (formerly Integromat) is a general-purpose automation platform with a larger integration library but basic AI capabilities limited to OpenAI modules.
Is Evaligo a good Make.com alternative for AI workflows?
Yes, Evaligo is an excellent Make.com alternative for AI-heavy workflows. While Make.com excels at complex data transformations and has 1,500+ integrations, Evaligo provides superior AI capabilities including prompt testing, multi-provider LLM support, AI vision processing, and one-click API deployment.
Why is Make.com cheaper than Evaligo?
Make.com's pricing reflects its general-purpose automation focus. AI operations on Make.com require multiple module executions (operations) per workflow, which adds up quickly. Evaligo's pricing includes native AI processing with optimized token management, making it more cost-effective for AI-intensive workflows.
Which has better visual workflow building?
Both platforms offer excellent visual builders. Make.com's scenario canvas is more mature with advanced data mapping. Evaligo's flow editor is optimized for AI workflows with specialized nodes for prompts, iteration, and datasets. Make.com may feel more familiar to existing automation users; Evaligo is more intuitive for AI-first workflows.
Can I migrate workflows from Make.com to Evaligo?
There's no automatic migration tool, but most Make.com scenarios can be recreated in Evaligo. Common modules like HTTP, JSON, and data transformation have direct equivalents. AI-related modules are significantly easier to implement in Evaligo with native prompt and vision nodes.
Which platform has better error handling?
Both platforms offer robust error handling. Make.com provides error handlers, break modules, and commit/rollback for transactions. Evaligo offers automatic retries with exponential backoff, error routing, and partial failure handling. For AI workflows, Evaligo's error handling is more suited to handling LLM-specific issues like rate limits and timeouts.
Ready to Build AI Workflows?
Start free and see why teams choose Evaligo for AI workflow automation.
No credit card required • Free tier includes 500 runs/month